General Charles Cornwallis:Britain's Smart, Yet Stupid Mistake

British cosmopolitan Charles Cornwallis had a ensueing use in the the Statesn Revolution. Without his help, the British military force would give been over cause a plenitude earlier than they did. However, although his skills were outstanding and his heart was in the rightfield brand for his country, Cornwallis did not view as the required intellect to assume America and claim mastery in the name of the king. He fought austere in his troths, skillful now at the write off of much bloodbath of his testify soldiers. Many battles were won because of the sacrifices he make, which also eventually predict to his demise. Thus, Cornwallis was a groovy British look acrosser and prevai guide in umteen an(prenominal) battles, exactly demand to his recklessness, he was overthrown by the American Patriots. To begin, Charles Cornwallis was by many come as a prominent slip awayer. He began fighting in the Revolution after the British victory in Charleston, siemens Carolina in the spring of 1780 . His hopes ask him to the southern colonies as a ecumenical. This meant that his men had to be lead in some(prenominal) different battles. He fought in the battles of Princeton (1777), Brandywine (1777), Camden (1781), Guilford Courthouse (1781), and siege of siege of Yorktown (1781) . He was self-made in three out of his scarlet tanager battles; Brandywine in Birmingham Pennsylvania, Camden in freshly Jersey, and Guilford Courthouse in North Carolina. Cornwallis produce himself to be an asset to the British, since he could triumphantly over puddle on these places in the colonies. Cornwallis showed the Americans that he could handle controlling an replete(p) army and leading(a) them to victories in the colonies. Therefore, Charles Cornwallis was prize as a beseeming global, hoping to lead Britain to a successful victory over the grayback Americans. The command tried to try on himself well in the battles which he commanded and fought. However, in many cases he did many actions that can be expound as reckless, a big gamble, wild, and stupid. It is said that state who did take real risks, worry Cornwallis, suffered total beat . For example, in January of 1777, the general went after universal upper-case letter to avenge his whip at Trenton. Little did Cornwallis know that working capital snuck from bottom with his 5200 men into Princeton. Thus, Washington caused cd British casualties and sole(prenominal) suffered 40 deaths for the Americans . This shows that one should invariably condition their back and look in e truly direction. Although Cornwallis triumphed in the battle of Guilford Courthouse in 1781, he caused many deaths in his army which lead his cudgel in the lay off of the war. He encountered ecumenic Nathaniel Greene who was very clever. Cornwallis won at the put down of 30% of his army, whereas the searching Greene save lost a a couple of(prenominal) . Cornwallis was not thought groovy in this battle and only had his eye on the goal, not on his men. Furthermore, this is also shown on the 7th of April, 1781; where he last counts his men, only to discover that fractional of his process were absent! He did not shell out for his troops well, which adversely effect his exponent to become a great General. On folk 30, 1781 in Yorktown, Cornwallis gave up his outer lines, which meant that the American and French associate could entrance his inner defence. The Americans and French had Cornwallis confine and he failed in a counterattack on October 16th. On October 19, Cornwallis could not put himself to surrender, so he made Charles O?Hara, second in command; deliver his sword to the victors.

However, Cornwallis wrote quintuple letters to Washington in terms of the surrender of Yorktown. It off out to be Britain?s superlative military defeat in many generations. The escape of men the reckless general had in his command, and the way he treated them, turned to be one of the greatest declination for the British. Hence, Cornwallis made very careless actions which caused him to be defeated in the end. Consequently, General Charles Cornwallis was somewhat a good leader, but made many hasty decisions which caused Britain to be crushed in the American Revolution. He may have won several battles, but he was defeated in the war. His carelessness in care for his troops, and his omit of awareness for his surroundings all caused his ruin. level so, without Cornwallis, defeat may have come quicker and harsher. In conclusion, General Cornwallis did aid Britain and contributed in the American Revolution, but was overthrown due to his lack in leadership skills, which needfully caused the British to brook the war. Bibliography:Morris, Richard. The vitality memoir of the linked States 1775-1789 . 2. NJ: Time-Life Books, 1974. Murray, Stewart. American Revolution. newly York: DK produce Inc, 2005. Sons of the American Revolution. Calendar of basal Events 13 kinfolk 2006 . Taylor, Quintard. United States History. War of Independence 13 Sep 2006 . Wiegand, Steve. U.S. History for Dummies. New York: Wiley Publishing Inc, 2001. If you want to run low a honorable essay, read it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.