John Calvin's Knowledge of God

16). It would seem that here Calvin follows Luther's curse of the Bishop Tetzels and others of Catholicism who troll for monetary donation to assure a place in heaven for human sinners.

The main root word seems to be an anti-Catholic (as well as a small "Catholic") argument against the pomp and majesty of the religion that worships idols and figures, and seems to promise everyone a "happy ending." By that, Calvin implies that the "salvation" Catholicism seems to offer is a sham: "Works Righteousness Is Wrongly Inferred from Reward" (Book III, l.18). Calvin seems to assert that our pull downtual "reward", whether heaven or hell, is predetermined by God, and he therefore implies Catholic bishops and priests atomic number 18 evil in assuming that payment (sort of "rewards" to the Church) gutter change this pre-determined end result. Calvin withal indicates that the Cross and Jesus' martyrdom are a form of fasting that the pompous "Papists" have seemed to have forgotten. He is refuting the idea that the depression of "Christ Died For Our Sins" can imply with the right sort of reward, Catholic sinners need not die in the same way. Prayer, not posture, seems to be Calvin's ways of denying the Catholic Church's right to be the " all" proper Church to worship God, His Son, and the Holy Spirit. In his receive way, then, Calvin is truly narrow-minded and unforgiving.

It is difficult to come to terms with much of what Calvin discusses as if it were

unrivaled can disagree with Calvin because he seldom, if ever, gives anyone the benefit of the doubt. When it comes to the behavior and existence of Mankind, everything seems to be painted in black-and-white, good-and-evil, predestined to head to salvation or, no matter what, headed straight for hell. He does agree with most in effect(p) religionists (of all faiths) that the Bible, that is, the volumes, are undeniable the truth and the Only Truth. "So Far as Human Reason Goes, Sufficiently fast Proofs Are At Hand to Establish the Credibility of Scripture" (Book !, l.8). He never goes into detail, however, to explain this theory, except to say "Scripture, to objurgate All Superstition,. Has Set the True God Alone over Against All the Gods of the Heathen" (Book 1, l.10).

He never explains who these "heathens" are. Is he talk about Jews, Muslims, and the so-called "Papists?" It might seem that anyone other than those roll in the hay firmly believe in Calvinism would be considered "heathens."

Particularly in today's era of "Feminism" one has to take issue with Calvin in that directlyhere in his four books is there mention of a female character, but only "Man" and "Papists" and "Adam". fleck there is definitely a patriarchal system animated and well (if festering a bit) within the Roman Catholic Church, surely women are now ministers in both Protestant and Jewish congregations. So, Calvin may be considered misogynistic, at best.

There is in like manner now some serious doubt about the infallibility and verity of the New as well as the Old Testament. One notion has it that the words of the disciples were often written down and redact years, decades, perhaps centuries after the initial writing or conversation. We even find some differences within the same event among Mark, Luke and Matthew. It is the born-again Christians, the so-called Evangelicals who are now rising to political power, who now piggy-back on Calvinist lore: the Bible and its words are not to be challenged.

www.w
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.